Like T, I feel a reflexive disgust at the wave of drug scandals in the sporting world. But I’ve always had a hard time articulating just why I feel this way.
I used to think it was about fairness. Players who don’t take drugs (such as Ken Griffey, Jr.) should not have to compete with, or have their accomplishments compared against, players who do take drugs (such as Barry Bonds). But the fairness argument doesn’t support a drug ban. If anything, it supports the democratization of drugs: drugs for the (athletic) masses! In other words, the fairness argument merely suggests that drug use should be available (or not) to all players, rather than only to some. For instance, pitchers often guzzle coffee before a big game to help their concentration, but nobody says that this practice is “unfair,” because anybody who wants to can pick up a cup of joe.
So what is it about the use of drugs, rather than the selective use of drugs, that is so distasteful? It can’t be that drugs create superhumans to whom we no longer relate. That’s already happened. As the New Yorker wrote a little while back,
Professional athletes once looked like somebody we knew, that friendly young fellow down the block who could run fast and dunk the ball or throw it a mile—not us exactly but close enough, and there in the games to represent if not always our town or our college then our species. This illusion waned when everyday N.B.A. players grew to six feet eight or better and N.F.L. linemen suddenly averaged two hundred and ninety pounds and could run forty yards in under six seconds….Nor is the problem that drug use will create uniformly skilled players. You can pump me full of steroids, amphetamines, and whatever the hell else they use nowadays, and I will never run like a clean Ben Johnson or bike anywhere near as hard as Floyd Landis, even if he were undrugged, ill, and out of practice.The dream of intimacy—it was always fantasy—is gone, and today’s players, so close to us on our plasma screens, are galaxies away from our own doings and capabilities.
Finally, the problem also isn’t that drug use saps the fun out of sports. If anything, it would just add another element. Right now athletes and their teams have to apply all sorts of arcane knowledge to push their already superhuman bodies to the limit: sports medicine, training regimens, special diets, etc. What’s so bad about adding drug cocktails to the mix?
None of these doubts has dampened my anger at each new revelation. So, please, comment away, and help fuel my intuitive outrage.
October 7, 2006 at 4:56 pm
A couple more ideas:
–As far as baseball, at least, performance-enhancing drugs destroy the continuity of the game and prevent meaningful inter-era comparisons. For me, this is huge… who gives a crap if someone today breaks a Babe Ruth record if they’re not doing it on the same terms as he did?
–Re: the democratization of drugs… that’s not really true, because allowing drugs would essentially force everyone to take them in order to compete, whether they wanted to or not. I gather that there are serious health risks with a lot of these substances, and you shouldn’t have to assume those risks just to play a sport professionally.
October 9, 2006 at 2:59 pm
I take your first point, T, but haven’t inter-era comparisons already been broken somewhat by, say, the advent of the live ball, advances in sports medicine (such as Tommy John surgery), the modern use of sports videos and replays, and other changes?
As for your second point, what about the old “permit but regulate” argument: the health risks of certain drugs might be smoothed out if there were more extensive testing. Also, a lot of sports already involve plenty of physical risk. (Baseball is not a good example of this; football and boxing are better.) Over time drug use might come to be seen as just another part of that risk, and perhaps not even the most substantial part.
I guess my own feeling about sports drug use is that it makes explicit two of the biggest problems with contemporary sports: the influence of money (the Yankees could build a better A-Rod with the money they’re paying him), and the alienness of the players (as the New Yorker piece argued). We still have a fantasy about sports as a realm of pure achievement, where a bit of talent and a whole lot of grit and hard work achieve success. Isn’t that the theme of every cheesy sports movie ever made? But drug use breaks that fantasy. Instead of baseball, we get BattleBots. The game might still be fun, but it won’t be the same.